Architekt jako sztukmistrz

For architecture it is easier to be contemporary then for other arts, because, at least, for architecture new materials are developed to enable to erect buildings not imaginable before, electronic materials included. From the other hand electronic architecture is understood sometimes as provocative experience, as it seems to be not for instant use. However, electronic architecture being part of contemporary art has a right to be excessive and provocative. It is the first step of its development, maybe it is its true genesis. So, architect knows how to deal with electronic material and knows how to bring nonexistent to reality. It could be said that it is activity as of magician one. But in art we can work both rationally or nonsensically, with dreamlike approach or on realty, between live and death. This is why "difference" is praiseworthy, and such are excess and provocation as showing way how to be modern and contemporary. It means I am for any surprise proposed by architect, even if we use to think it is nothing but magicians proposal to have fun. I am trying to remember in such a moment that magic is necessary in live to the same extent as everyday reality