„Z racji swoich upodobań godny napiętnowania” – homofobia i seksizm w kryminologicznym dyskursie gwałtu

This article analyzes an expert discourse used during a court trial of men accused of gang raping a 30-year-old man in the early 1990s. The author argues that we could look for sources of homophobic and sexist language used by the perpetrators’ defense counsel in two expert discourses that were shaped during the 1970s: in the discourse of heterosexual rape, within which the female victim was perceived as responsible for the rape, and in the criminological discourse of homosexuality, within which the homosexual was presented as explicitly “perverted” and unable to control his sexual desire.