Węzłowe konstrukcje prawne procesu planistycznego i budowlanego w rozwiązaniach projektu ustawy - Kodeks urbanistyczno-budowlany (wersja z 30 września 2016 r.)

Draft Urban Planning and Construction Code, which was made a subject of open debate on 30th September 2016, does not provide for a coherent system of spatial planning acts in which arrangements of specialist acts would stem from general ones. While introducing new contribution – infrastructural fee, it does not provide for sufficient legal grounds in order to charge the costs of urbanization to entities which receive profits therefrom. Despite eliminating investment special-purpose acts, the drafters retained the institution of administrative decisions which are used by organs of public administration to locate the public-purpose investment and limit the role of construction permit in the construction process, what altogether raises major doubts as to constitutionality. A positive solution, however, is the attempt to eliminate now-in-force compensation rules applicable when adoption or change of zoning plan causes the current usage of a real estate or its part impossible.