Nāgārjuna’s No-Thesis Statement (Vigraha-vyāvartanī 29) as an Absurd Consequence Revisited

Made in Vigraha-vyāvartanī verse 29, Nāgārjuna’s claim that he does not have any thesis has long perplexed scholars as to both its meaning and the very reasonableness of its employment. In this paper I offer an alternative to the scholarly interpretations which assume that this claim can be abstracted from the context of the fictitious debate presented in the treatise. Rather than taking it to signal an actual standpoint of Nāgārjuna, I propose to read the no-thesis statement as an absurd consequence, part of an elaborate exchange which showcases the irrationality of a realist-antirealist debate.