Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus‐based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping

Tytuł:
p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus‐based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping
Autorzy:
Mazurec, Karolina
Wantuchowicz, Mariola
Trzeszcz, Martyna
Jach, Robert
Kotkowska-Szeps, Izabela
Streb, Joanna
Duczek‐Polakiewicz, Monika
Halon, Agnieszka
Rozmus, Patrycja
Kania, Magdalena
Wasowska, Jolanta
Mazurec, Maciej
Data publikacji:
2023
Słowa kluczowe:
p16/Ki67 dual‐stain
cancer biomarkers
CINtec PLUS
high‐risk HPV
cervical cancer screening
genotyping
triage
Język:
angielski
ISBN, ISSN:
01466615
Prawa:
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
Linki:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.29271  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
The introduction of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening requires the implementation of an appropriate triage strategy that will be effective in detecting high-grade cervical disease without losing diagnostic specificity. From the 30.066 screening tests results, a total of 1086 with available high-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) with limited genotyping, cytology, and p16/Ki67 dual-stain were selected. Two triage strategies for primary HPV screening were analyzed retrospectively based on the study group. Performance characteristics for p16/Ki67 and cytology triage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) were calculated, detected in colposcopic biopsy. In HPV16/18-positive cases, primary HPV with p16/Ki67 triage was significantly more specific than cytology (53.1%/16.8% for CIN2+; p < 0.0001; 45.9%/17.0% for CIN3+; p < 0.0001), with yielded sensitivity (95.7%/84.8% for CIN2+; p = 0.0955; 100.0%/87.5% for CIN3+; p = 0.0832). In other HRHPV-positive cases (N16/N18), p16/Ki67 triage was also significantly higher specific (51.3%/15.3% for CIN2+; p < 0.0001; 44.5%/16.5% for CIN3+; p < 0.0001), with sensitivity (92.3%/74.4% for CIN2+; p = 0.0522; 90.9%/81.8% for CIN3+; p = 0.5637). Diagnostic predictive values were significantly higher for p16/Ki67 triage with the highest PPV in HPV16/18-positive cases for CIN2+ (45.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.2–55.8; p < 0.0001) and very high NPV in all HPV-positive cases regardless of detected genotype (96.3%–100.0%). The risk (1-NPV) for CIN3+ in HRHPV16/18-positive/p16/Ki67-negative women was 0.0%. Superior diagnostic performance compared to cytology for detecting cervical cancer precursors indicates that p16/Ki67 dual-immunostain may be a highly effective tool of triage in primary HPV screening with limited HPV 16/18 genotyping in secondary cervical cancer prevention.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies