Tytuł pozycji:
The benefit of optimizing recanalization during mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke depends on preprocedural tissue-level collateralization
- Tytuł:
-
The benefit of optimizing recanalization during mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke depends on preprocedural tissue-level collateralization
- Autorzy:
-
Homa, Tomasz
Turaj, Wojciech
Słowik, Agnieszka
Wrona, Paweł
Sawczyńska, Katarzyna
Wróbel, Dominik
Mizera, Paweł
Popiela, Tadeusz
Jóźwik, Joanna
Jakobschy, Klaudia
Zdrojewska, Kaja
- Data publikacji:
-
2024
- Język:
-
angielski
- ISBN, ISSN:
-
00283940
- Linki:
-
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00234-024-03443-7 Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
- Dostawca treści:
-
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
-
Abstract
Purpose
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 3 represents the optimal angiographic outcome following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although it is known to yield better outcomes than TICI 2b, the influence of preprocedural cerebral hemodynamics on the clinical advantage of TICI 3 over TICI 2b remains unexplored.
Methods
This single-center retrospective analysis involved patients with anterior circulation AIS who underwent successful recanalization during MT at the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital, Krakow between January 2019 and July 2023. We assessed the benefit of achieving TICI 2c/3 over TICI 2b on the basis of preprocedural computed perfusion imaging results, primarily focusing on early infarct volume (EIV) and tissue-level collaterals indicated by hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR). Good functional outcome (GFO) was defined as a modified Rankin Score < 3 on day 90.
Results
The study comprised 612 patients, of whom 467 (76.3%) achieved TICI 2c/3. GFO was more frequent in the TICI 2c/3 group (54.5% vs 69.4%, p < 0.001). There was interaction between the recanalization status and both HIR (Pi = 0.042) and EIV (Pi = 0.012) in predicting GFO, with disproportionately higher impact of HIR and EIV in TICI 2b group. The benefit from TICI 2c/3 over TICI 2b was insignificant among patients with good collaterals, defined by HIR < 0.3 (odds ratio:1.36 [0.58–3.18], p = 0.483).
Conclusion
TICI 2c/3 improves patient functional outcomes compared to TICI 2b regardless of EIV. However, such angiographic improvement may be clinically futile in patients with good tissue-level collateralization. Our findings suggest that preprocedural HIR should be considered when optimization of recanalization is considered during MT.
