Jak se hodnotí kvalita historikovy vědecké práce (Evaluace výsledků české historické vědy podle Metodiky17+ za léta 2016-2020)

The study deals with the genesis of evaluation processes of the results of science and research in history in the Czech Republic. It summarises the fundamental problems related to the relationship between the evaluation of the results of basic and applied research and the funding of individual workplaces. The attention is focused on the current state of the art, i.e., the progress and results of evaluation according to Methodology 17+ for the past five-year period (2016–2020), defines the main weaknesses of this system and explains why bibliometric tools are unusable for history (and other humanities) in practice and why they are not considered at all in the national assessment of science and research in these fields. It introduces discussion topics related to the currently ongoing adjustment of the entire evaluation system so that it takes more into account the discipline specifics of individual scientific areas.