PROČ CHÁPAT POPPERŮV KRITICKÝ DUALISMUS DECISIONISTICKY

There is not much in the open society to suggest that Karl Popper was a moral objectivist. Yet, that is exactly what he himself claimed later in life. Was the widespread “decisionistic” reading of the open society just a grand misunderstanding, or did Popper change his meta-ethical views without acknowledging it? I give reasons as to why we should hold the latter to be true. I also argue that even were the former the case, decisionism would still be more compatible with the open society ideal.