Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

ПРО ДВОРІВНЕВЕ ЗНО З МАТЕМАТИКИ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ПІДГОТОВКИ ДО НЬОГО

Tytuł:
ПРО ДВОРІВНЕВЕ ЗНО З МАТЕМАТИКИ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ПІДГОТОВКИ ДО НЬОГО
On the peculiarities of two-level independent external assessment of quality of knowledge in mathematics
Autorzy:
Олександр Школьний
Data publikacji:
2016-02-22
Tematy:
two-level math achievements assessment
national standardized outcome assessment
senior school pupils
state final attestation
independent external assessment
Język:
ukraiński
Dostawca treści:
CEJSH
Artykuł
  Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
In 2015 Ukraine has attempted introduction of two-level system of external assessment of quality of knowledge in mathematics. The naturalness and usefulness of such system of testing in math was based in our series of publications in scientific pedagogical literature. In these works we proposed two-level system of standardized national assessment of educational progress in mathematics for Ukrainian pupils. Implemented by the Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment in 2015 two-level test in mathematics is different from our project, although some of our suggestions were taken into account. We believe that the option of two-level testing in math, consisting of test advanced level, which includes as part basic level is not perfect and has some shortcomings that should be removed in the future. We are aware that the introduction of a two-level math test raises a number of methodological issues for professionals who prepare pupils for this type of assessment. It was very difficult for Mathematics teacher to provide adequate quality of math testing in 2015, since the decision to impose of two-level math test was made quite suddenly. The second reason for the complexity of training of Ukrainian pupils for two-level math test 2015 is tedious for most of them the 210-minute marathon, you need to write in-depth test. In our view, not all pupils are capable to thinking in the situation of stress for so long. As a result, it is not clear what actually checks realized test: physical endurance of the test participant or his knowledge, skills (competencies)? We hope that the above mentioned disadvantages of introducing two-level math testing will continue to be taken into account. It is also noted that, despite the rejection of the two-level model of testing in 2016, methodological publications on the specifics of preparation have not lost relevance because, in our opinion, returning to such model is only a matter of time and valuable experience. In this paper we consider the features of two-level independent external assessment of quality of knowledge in math compared with traditional one-tier system of national standardized test and put methodological recommendations for preparing pupils for this type of testing related to topics «Plane geometry» and «Space geometry».

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies