Mechanisms That Could Be Used to Prevent Diplomats from Abusing the Immunities and Privileges of Their Authority

Kwestia nadużyć w zakresie przywilejów i immunitetów dyplomatycznych budzi poważne obawy, ponieważ może potencjalnie zakłócać stosunki dyplomatyczne. Problem ten można przypisać wzrostowi liczby osób, którym przyznano immunitet. Niewystarczające przeszkolenie personelu dyplomatycznego i brak wytycznych etycznych odegrały rolę w coraz częstszym wykorzystywaniu przez przedstawicieli dyplomatycznych przysługujących im przywilejów i immunitetów dyplomatycznych. Skłoniło to państwa do bardziej rygorystycznego egzekwowania przepisów dotyczących przywilejów i immunitetów dyplomatycznych oraz do zaproponowania środków mających na celu zwalczanie takich niewłaściwych zachowań.     A Fine Mess: How Diplomats Get Away Without Paying Parking Tickets, at https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/sep/23/fine-diplomats-not-paying-parking-tickets. Ahmad, N. (2020). The obligation of diplomats to respect the laws and regulations of the hosting state: A critical overview of the international practices. Laws All Answers Ltd, 'Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961' (Lawteacher.Net, June 2023) <https://www.Lawteacher.Net/acts/vienna-Convention-Diplomatic-Relations-1961.Php?Vref=1> Accessed 18 June 2023, at https://www.lawteacher.net/acts/vienna-convention-diplomatic-relations-1961.php#citethis. Breaking Diplomatic Ties.” https://dotnepal.com/breaking-diplomatic-ties/. Bashir Shuraihu LADAN, (2015)“A CRITIQUE OF DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY IN INTERNATIOANAL LAW” Denza, E. (2016). Diplomatic law: commentary on the Vienna convention on diplomatic relations. Oxford University Press. Diplomatic and consular immunity: Guidance for law enforcement and judicial authorities. (1998). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of State. Farahmand, A. M. (1989). Diplomatic Immunity and Ciplomatic Crime: A Legislative Proposal to Curtail Abuses. J. Legis., 16, 89. Farhangi, L. S. (1986). Insuring against abuse of diplomatic immunity. Stanford Law Review, 1517-1547. Foreign Diplomats Involved in 22 Serious Traffic Offences in Three Years, at https://www.dutchnews.nl/2020/08/foreign-diplomats-involved-in-22-serious-traffic-offences-in-three-years/. Franklin, C. M. (1961). APPENDIX E: OPTIONAL PROTOCOL OF SIGNATURE CONCERNING THE COMPULSORY SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES. International Law Studies, 53(1), 10. Hendrapati, M. (2014). Legal Regime of Persona Non Grata and the Namru-2 Case. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 32, 161. Hill, C. (1931). Sanctions constraining diplomatic representatives to abide by the local law. American Journal of International Law, 25(2), 252-269. Hudson, M. O. (1932). A Guide to Diplomatic Practice. By Sir Ernest Satow. revised by H. Ritchie.(London, New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green & Co., 1932. pp. x, 519. Index. $12.50.). American Journal of International Law, 26(4), 933-934. Keaton, J. J. (1989). Does the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Mandate Relief for Victims of Diplomatic Immunity Abuse. Hastings Const. LQ, 17, 567. Maginnis, V. L. (2002). Limiting diplomatic immunity: lessons learned from the 1946 Convention on the privileges and immunities of the United Nations. Brook. J. Int'l L., 28, 989. Michael Janofsky, Georgian Diplomat Pleads Guilty in Death of Teen‑Age Girl, at https://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/09/us/georgian-diplomat-pleads-guilty-in-death-of-teen-age-girl.html. Persona Non Grata, at https://dotnepal.com/persona-non-grata/ (visited Sep. 6, 2023). Przetacznik, F. (1978). The history of the jurisdictional immunity of the diplomatic agents in English law. Anglo-American Law Review, 7(4), 348-395. Southwick, J. T. (1988). Abuse of Diplomatic Privilege and Immunity: Compensatory and Restrictive Reforms. Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com., 15, 83. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961.

The issue of abuse pertaining to diplomatic privileges and immunities is of significant concern, as it has the potential to disrupt diplomatic relations. This issue can be attributed to the rise in the number of individuals who are granted immunity. Insufficient training of diplomatic personnel and a deficiency in ethical guidelines have played a role in the increasing occurrence of diplomatic envoys exploiting their diplomatic privileges and immunities. This has prompted states to enforce the regulations governing diplomatic privileges and immunities more strictly and to propose remedies to combat such misconduct.