Tytuł pozycji:
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as rescue or bridge therapy
- Tytuł:
-
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as rescue or bridge therapy
- Autorzy:
-
Legutko, Jacek
Trębacz, Jarosław
Dudek, Dariusz
Sorysz, Danuta
Stapor, Maciej
Kleczyński, Paweł
Kulbat, Aleksandra
Brzychczy, Piotr
Bartuś, Stanisław
Dziewierz, Artur
Rzeszutko, Łukasz
- Data publikacji:
-
2021
- Słowa kluczowe:
-
heart failure
bridge therapy
balloon aortic valvuloplasty
aortic stenosis
destination therapy
- Język:
-
angielski
- ISBN, ISSN:
-
20770383
- Prawa:
-
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
- Linki:
-
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/20/4657  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
- Dostawca treści:
-
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
-
The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.