Tytuł pozycji:
The role of Parkinson Nurses for personalizing care in Parkinsons disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Tytuł:
-
The role of Parkinson Nurses for personalizing care in Parkinsons disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Autorzy:
-
Fabbri, Margherita
Clemens, Timo
Pedrosa, David J.
Rascol, Olivier
Czabanowska, Katarzyna
van Munster, Marlena
Mestre, Tiago A.
Stumpel, Johanne
Ratajczak, Florin
Thieken, Franziska
- Data publikacji:
-
2022
- Słowa kluczowe:
-
Parkinson nurse
Parkinson’s disease
personalized care
quality of life
role of specialized care nurse
PDQ-39
- Język:
-
angielski
- ISBN, ISSN:
-
18777171
- Prawa:
-
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.pl
- Linki:
-
https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-parkinsons-disease/jpd223215  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
- Dostawca treści:
-
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
-
Background: Quality of life (QoL) of persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is diminished by (non-)motor symptoms, that require personalized care. Parkinson Nurses (PN) may be pivotal promoting tailored care offerings. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates PD care models and aims at furnishing current concepts of PN to offer personalized care.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify the various roles and functions that PN may hold for personalized PD care.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature review, utilizing: PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO. The review qualitatively evaluated articles, which described personalized care models involving PNs and was guided by the personalized care management model. A meta-analysis compared patient-reported QoL (quantified using the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire) between personalized care interventions involving PN versus standard care with. Results: Twenty-seven publications were identified, including six randomized, controlled trials ascertaining with health related QoL (n = 1830 PwPs). The qualitative evaluation revealed that PN contribute to all aspects of personalized care. The meta-analysis showed no improved QoL in personalized care models compared to standard care, thought a great heterogeneity among study design and interventions was outlined (Standardized Mean Difference = –0.8935; 95% Confidence Interval, –2.1177 to 0.3307; z = –1.43, p = 0.1526). Conclusion: PN fulfil important functions in personalized PD care. For the future, a clear role definition will be necessary to adjust training for PN across healthcare systems and care settings but especially to realize their full potential for PD care.