Cultural comparative studies : interpretation and existence

New opportunities for pursuance of literary comparative studies, referred to these days as "new/non-classical/cultural" comparative studies, have occurred in the last two decades, particularly after the interventions (by e.g. S. Bassnett, G.C. Spivak) claiming a "death" of the discipline. The author diagnoses the condition of comparative studies in literature, stressing non-commensurability of comparative-study projects and taking into account three currents in comparative studies: traditional (19th-century heritage); interdisciplinary (interdisciplinary comparative studies existing since late 1960s/early 1970s); and, cultural (cultural comparative studies developed since late 1980s/early 1990s). Regardless of how one may approach the enormous tradition of comparative studies, departure from what once was ethno-/eurocentrism appears to be the distinguishing mark of the new paradigm: cultural comparative studies. The author argues in the first place that cultural comparative studies - being a modern form of literary studies - are a nomadic discipline. The suggestion is that the modern comparative studies be approached not as a constantly extending domain of issues and limitless expansion, but rather as an effect of thinking which enables us in today’s world - if Armando Gnisci’s metaphor is acceptable here - to "decolonise ourselves"; as an interpretative practice deeply founded in daily existence.